
Troy Jackson
Supports AI development only with stronger corporate cost-sharing, labor protections, environmental oversight, public transparency, and community control.
Both candidates accept a role for advanced computing in Maine. Jackson demands stronger cost, labor, and environmental conditions. Collins favors case-by-case review and investment at suitable sites.
Jackson says AI companies should provide power, pay for upgrades, protect workers, and answer to communities. Collins supports data infrastructure and high-performance computing while evaluating commercial projects individually, with former mill sites and existing hydropower viewed more favorably.

Supports AI development only with stronger corporate cost-sharing, labor protections, environmental oversight, public transparency, and community control.

Supports targeted AI safeguards, public computing investment, and case-by-case data-center development tied to suitable energy and industrial sites.
Construction, cost allocation, local control, and siting.
Would require AI companies to provide power, pay for grid upgrades, protect natural resources, create union jobs, and work with local communities.
“Who benefits, who pays and who decides?”Open reported statement ↗
The campaign said companies should pay their fair share and not expect Maine families to subsidize their energy needs.
Open reporting ↗Supports evaluating projects individually and sees former mill sites with existing hydropower as potentially suitable, while also funding public high-performance computing.
Collins said projects should be handled case by case and expressed support for former mill locations with existing power.
Open reporting ↗Secured $6.2 million for a Maine high-performance computing hub serving AI, biotechnology, and manufacturing.
Open official source ↗Transparency, safeguards, and prohibited uses.
Calls for transparency when Maine government uses AI and broader scrutiny of technology companies, but has not published a federal model-testing framework.
The Agency over AI plan included transparency for state-government AI and worker and environmental safeguards.
Open reported statement ↗Supports banning materially deceptive AI election content and federal guidance for election administrators rather than general model licensing.
The Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act targets fraudulent synthetic election content.
Open official source ↗Power supply, ratepayer costs, and environmental effects.
Says AI companies should build their own power sources and pay for upgrades rather than shift infrastructure costs to residents.
Jackson paired cost responsibility with environmental oversight and protections for Maine's natural resources.
Open reported statement ↗Favors projects where existing industrial infrastructure and hydropower can support demand, with individual review rather than a blanket rule.
Collins identified former mill sites with nearby hydropower as stronger candidates for development.
Open reporting ↗Labor standards, displacement, training, and employment.
Would require good-paying union jobs and safeguards against AI replacing Maine workers.
Jackson's AI plan and Senate campaign consistently frame worker power and corporate accountability as core conditions.
Open campaign source ↗Supports AI research, commercialization, education, and high-technology job creation through Maine computing investments.
The computing hub is designed to help researchers, entrepreneurs, and industry commercialize data-intensive products.
Open official source ↗Competition, corporate power, and public investment.
Promises scrutiny of AI companies and technology billionaires and supports higher taxes on large corporations, but has not proposed a specific AI antitrust structure.
The campaign calls for taxing billionaires and large corporations and shifting power toward workers.
Open campaign source ↗Supports publicly funded computing infrastructure intended to help entrepreneurs, universities, and private industries compete and commercialize products.
The Maine hub is structured as shared infrastructure for research and industry rather than public control of AI firms.
Open official source ↗