The House at a glance.
Start with the 60 reviewed members' overall AI posture, then switch dimensions to compare their records issue by issue. Select any colored seat to inspect its source-backed position. Gray seats have not yet been reviewed.
60 reviewed records.
These profiles connect each position to legislation, official statements, committee work, and other primary congressional records.
Mike Lawler
Targeted federal safeguards.Supports disclosure and accountability rules for synthetic election media and automated systems, alongside technology-sector growth.
View public record →
Zach Nunn
Research, adoption, and guardrails.Supports broader AI research access, workforce development, agricultural adoption, and national safeguards for high-risk uses.
View public record →
David Valadao
Agricultural technology and infrastructure.Approaches technology through agriculture, water, rural infrastructure, reliable energy, and business adoption.
View public record →
Juan Ciscomani
Reliable power and regional growth.Supports grid modernization, reliable supply, and continued technology investment tied to jobs and regional growth.
View public record →
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
Workers, repair, and small business.Approaches technology through skilled trades, repair rights, small manufacturers, rural businesses, and concentrated corporate power.
View public record →
Marcy Kaptur
Workers, communities, and public safeguards.Approaches technology through manufacturing jobs, energy affordability, consumer protection, and public accountability.
View public record →
Ro Khanna
Innovation with national guardrails.Supports technology investment alongside competition policy, worker protections, and federal accountability rules.
Open official profile ↗
Don Beyer
Federal standards and accountability.Supports federal AI safeguards, testing, transparency, and a national framework for advanced systems.
Open official profile ↗
Jay Obernolte
A federal framework with measured safeguards.Pairs a national AI framework and frontier-system accountability with research access, infrastructure growth, and workforce planning.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Ted Lieu
Mandatory control for high-risk AI.Supports a national risk-based framework, federal AI standards, and mandatory human control for catastrophic-risk systems.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Yvette Clarke
Binding accountability for high-impact AI.Would require impact assessments and disclosures for AI used in employment, housing, credit, and education.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Jennifer McClellan
Protect ratepayers as AI infrastructure grows.Supports firm ratepayer protections and stronger grid planning for data centers.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Haley Stevens
Safe AI adoption for small businesses.Advances NIST guidance so small businesses can adopt AI with technical standards and best practices.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Sara Jacobs
Pre-deployment testing for catastrophic risks.Would require frontier AI evaluations for nuclear risks and preserve meaningful human authority over nuclear decisions.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Nathaniel Moran
Mandatory incident reporting for frontier AI.Would require advanced-model developers to disclose dangerous capabilities and serious incidents.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Mike Johnson
A uniform national framework for AI growth.Supports certainty for innovators, U.S. leadership, and targeted consumer and child-safety protections.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Darrell Issa
Federal rights against deceptive AI replicas.Supports targeted federal protections for voice, image, and likeness while avoiding broad new regulatory burdens.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Frank Lucas
Innovation, workforce, and voluntary standards.Favors federal research, education, and trustworthy-AI standards over burdensome regulation.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Zoe Lofgren
Research access with evidence-based safeguards.Supports federal AI evaluation capacity, workforce preparation, and measured data-center standards.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Lori Trahan
Binding oversight for frontier AI.Would require model cards, risk frameworks, independent audits, incident reporting, and ongoing assessments.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Valerie Foushee
People-first rules across AI systems.Supports frontier-model evaluation, chatbot safeguards, worker research, and data-center resource disclosure.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Greg Casar
Worker-first oversight of powerful AI companies.Would ban AI-driven surveillance pricing and wage setting and require accountability for frontier-system failures.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Brian Babin
Build the infrastructure needed to win the AI race.Calls for faster data-center, generation, and transmission buildout alongside research and workforce investment.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Brett Guthrie
Protect and accelerate U.S. AI buildout.Treats rapid domestic data-center and energy development as a national-security priority.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Bob Latta
Build data centers without shifting costs to families.Supports continued AI infrastructure growth with ratepayer protections and coordinated cybersecurity responses.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Jake Auchincloss
Platform liability for abusive AI content.Would condition platform protections on action against abusive deepfakes and add online-safety tools for families.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Doris Matsui
Preserve enforceable AI safeguards.Defends state authority to enforce consumer, privacy, and bias protections until meaningful federal safeguards exist.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Erin Houchin
Binding protections for children using AI chatbots.Would require disclosures, crisis resources, break prompts, and safety policies for chatbot services used by minors.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Celeste Maloy
Targeted rules for catastrophic and abusive AI harms.Would test advanced systems for nuclear risks and hold platforms accountable for abusive deepfakes.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Rich McCormick
Faster AI infrastructure and fewer export constraints.Calls for faster data-center and power permitting and opposes AI-chip export rules he sees as weakening U.S. leadership.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Frank Pallone
Community and consumer protections for AI deployment.Calls for firm safeguards around AI data centers, surveillance pricing, and dangerous chatbots.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Sarah McBride
Transparent models and sustainable infrastructure.Supports voluntary model documentation and lower-impact data-center technology that protects local resources.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Suzanne Bonamici
Human-centered AI for schools and workplaces.Supports student privacy, worker preparation, human oversight, bias testing, and automated-decision disclosures.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Laurel Lee
Transparency for AI crawlers and resilient infrastructure.Would require automated crawlers to identify themselves and strengthen accountability for grid resilience.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Gus Bilirakis
Platform accountability for deceptive and abusive AI.Supports crawler disclosure and rapid removal with penalties for nonconsensual AI-generated intimate images.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Tom Kean
AI literacy paired with enforceable deepfake protections.Supports K-12 AI education alongside labeling, criminal penalties, and civil remedies for harmful synthetic content.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Joe Morelle
Enforceable protections against harmful deepfakes.Supports criminal and civil remedies for nonconsensual synthetic imagery and clear labeling of AI-generated content.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Chris Deluzio
Strong worker protections from automated decisions.Would require human oversight, bias testing, disclosure, and limits on AI-driven employment decisions and surveillance.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Darren Soto
Practical AI adoption with workforce planning.Supports federal AI use for consumer safety and research on how automation will reshape jobs and skills.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Suhas Subramanyam
Support small AI firms and measure infrastructure costs.Backs small AI businesses, data-center energy standards, and oversight of concentrated AI investment risks.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
David Schweikert
Deploy AI rapidly across health care and government.Would expand AI prescribing, remote monitoring, claims processing, and automated federal auditing.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Don Bacon
Rapid, governed military AI adoption.Supports faster Pentagon AI adoption with risk-based oversight, testing, and human involvement.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Mariannette Miller-Meeks
Targeted protections for children using AI chatbots.Would require safety policies, disclosures, parental tools, and crisis protections for conversational AI used by minors.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Chuck Fleischmann
Expand energy and research capacity for AI leadership.Supports nuclear power, national-lab computing, and AI-enabled scientific discovery.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Pause AI data-center expansion until national safeguards exist.Supports a temporary construction moratorium until national rules protect workers, ratepayers, communities, and the environment.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Kathy Castor
Make data centers pay their own grid costs.Supports AI investment with binding protections that prevent data-center electricity costs from shifting to households.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Deborah Ross
Security reporting and bargaining rights around AI.Supports AI incident reporting, federal vulnerability standards, creator bargaining rights, and continued state authority.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
María Elvira Salazar
Federal rights against abusive AI replicas.Supports enforceable rights over voice and likeness, platform takedowns, and penalties for nonconsensual synthetic imagery.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Harriet Hageman
Civil-liberty controls for government use of AI.Supports privacy and accuracy reviews for courtroom AI and remedies against government-directed AI censorship.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Gabe Evans
Protect ratepayers while keeping U.S. AI competitive.Supports guardrails for severe AI misuse and grid-cost protections while resisting state rules he sees as slowing innovation.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Debbie Dingell
Protect people and communities as AI expands.Supports enforceable deepfake protections and AI data-center investment with ratepayer safeguards and public oversight.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Scott Peters
Build the energy and innovation base for AI growth.Supports faster transmission and energy permitting, customer protections, and stronger patent incentives for AI innovation.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Raja Krishnamoorthi
Secure U.S. AI leadership against foreign threats.Supports U.S. AI development with cybersecurity planning, advanced-chip controls, and intelligence-community oversight.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Bill Foster
Accountability for consequential and deceptive AI uses.Supports disclosure, investor protection, resilient digital identity, and technical controls for consequential AI systems.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Brittany Pettersen
Consumer protections alongside responsible AI innovation.Supports a national framework addressing fraud, identity theft, election risks, and financial-account security.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Darin LaHood
Win the AI race with targeted security controls.Supports rapid U.S. AI leadership with protections against espionage, chip smuggling, and risky foreign software.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Rob Wittman
Accelerate trusted military AI and its energy base.Supports faster military autonomy, common testing systems, risk-based review, and expanded nuclear and research capacity.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Morgan Griffith
Expand supervised AI adoption in health care.Supports broad health-care AI adoption with human supervision and more domestic energy for AI infrastructure.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
Nancy Mace
Keep broad rules light while targeting concrete harms.Opposes broad developer mandates while supporting federal AI training and penalties for nonconsensual deepfakes.
Open reviewed evidence ↗
French Hill
Regulatory flexibility with human accountability.Supports financial AI sandboxes, human review, documented compliance, consumer protection, and national privacy rules.
Open reviewed evidence ↗