Georgia · U.S. Senate

Ossoff vs. Collins

Ossoff supports continued AI growth with safeguards for power bills, children, health care, and biosafety. Collins emphasizes faster permitting, more energy supply, and business-led development, with less detail on AI-specific safeguards.

At a glance

Guardrails versus speed.

Ossoff treats AI as economically valuable but calls for enforceable protections in high-consequence uses and for data centers to pay their own grid costs. Collins offers an all-of-the-above energy and permitting agenda intended to lower costs and accelerate development, while leaving several AI-specific questions unanswered.

Compare by issueOfficial Senate and House records are separated from campaign positions.
Jon Ossoff
Democratic nominee

Jon Ossoff

U.S. senator · Former investigative journalist

Supports AI innovation with binding safeguards for ratepayers, children, health care, biosafety, and workers affected by rapid adoption.

Mike Collins
Republican nominee

Mike Collins

U.S. representative · Trucking company founder

Supports faster infrastructure permitting, all-of-the-above energy, lower development costs, and business-led job creation. His AI-specific governance record is limited.

01

Data centers

Construction, grid costs, forecasting, and permitting.

Build with conditionsHigh confidence

Supports data-center growth with enforceable ratepayer protections, credible pay-your-own-way commitments, and better large-load forecasting.

View evidence
Senate oversight letterApril 20, 2026
“My office is investigating AI data centers' impact on rising power bills.”
Open official source ↗
Build fasterMedium confidence

Supports cutting permitting barriers and expanding energy supply for infrastructure and economic development. The campaign has not published data-center-specific cost or water conditions.

View evidence
Campaign victory statementJune 16, 2026

Collins highlighted the PERMIT Act and an all-of-the-above energy agenda to lower costs and spur growth.

Open campaign source ↗
02

AI governance

Safety rules, liability, children, and high-risk uses.

Binding targeted rulesHigh confidence

Supports mandatory safeguards for child safety, biosafety, health-care decisions, and platform reporting rather than a general development ban.

View 2 evidence records
Senate investigationAug. 6, 2026

Ossoff launched an investigation into AI chatbots, synthetic abuse material, and risks to children.

Open official source ↗
Senate inquiryJuly 10, 2026

Called for mandatory screening against AI-assisted biological threats.

Open official source ↗
Not enough evidenceUnscored

The reviewed House and campaign record does not establish Collins's position on model testing, high-risk AI liability, deepfakes, or general release requirements.

03

Energy and grid

Power supply, household bills, and reliability.

Protect ratepayersHigh confidence

Wants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to prevent data-center generation and infrastructure costs from being passed to Georgia families and to test whether company commitments are enforceable.

View evidence
Senate oversight letterApril 20, 2026

The inquiry asks how federal regulators will handle forecasting, interconnection, and cost allocation for large loads.

Open official source ↗
Expand energy supplyHigh confidence

Calls for an all-of-the-above energy policy and less permitting friction to lower prices and support more economic activity.

View evidence
Campaign victory statementJune 16, 2026

Collins explicitly connects more energy supply and permitting reform to lower costs and growth.

Open campaign source ↗
04

Workers and jobs

Displacement, hiring, training, and development.

Prepare for disruptionHigh confidence

Calls for Congress to prepare for labor-market disruption, automated hiring, and education changes while preserving AI's productivity benefits.

View evidence
Senate hearingSept. 13, 2023

Ossoff convened a bipartisan hearing on AI's implications for work and human rights.

Open official source ↗
Prioritize job creationMedium confidence

Frames faster infrastructure and energy development as a route to lower costs, business growth, and more jobs. No AI worker-transition plan was located.

View evidence
Campaign victory statementJune 16, 2026

Collins presents his business experience and permitting agenda as tools for job creation and investment.

Open campaign source ↗
05

Market power

Platform duties, competition, and business-led development.

Enforce platform dutiesHigh confidence

Supports enforceable duties for large technology platforms in defined areas while leaving private AI development and market structure otherwise intact.

View evidence
Federal law and oversight2024-2026

The REPORT Act increases reporting duties and penalties for technology platforms handling child exploitation material.

Open official source ↗
Let markets leadMedium confidence

Favors private investment supported by faster permitting and more energy production, with no structural AI competition intervention in the reviewed record.

View evidence
Campaign victory statementJune 16, 2026

The campaign's economic agenda relies on business-led development and reduced regulatory barriers.

Open campaign source ↗