
Jon Ossoff
Supports AI innovation with binding safeguards for ratepayers, children, health care, biosafety, and workers affected by rapid adoption.
Ossoff supports continued AI growth with safeguards for power bills, children, health care, and biosafety. Collins emphasizes faster permitting, more energy supply, and business-led development, with less detail on AI-specific safeguards.
Ossoff treats AI as economically valuable but calls for enforceable protections in high-consequence uses and for data centers to pay their own grid costs. Collins offers an all-of-the-above energy and permitting agenda intended to lower costs and accelerate development, while leaving several AI-specific questions unanswered.

Supports AI innovation with binding safeguards for ratepayers, children, health care, biosafety, and workers affected by rapid adoption.

Supports faster infrastructure permitting, all-of-the-above energy, lower development costs, and business-led job creation. His AI-specific governance record is limited.
Construction, grid costs, forecasting, and permitting.
Supports data-center growth with enforceable ratepayer protections, credible pay-your-own-way commitments, and better large-load forecasting.
“My office is investigating AI data centers' impact on rising power bills.”Open official source ↗
Supports cutting permitting barriers and expanding energy supply for infrastructure and economic development. The campaign has not published data-center-specific cost or water conditions.
Collins highlighted the PERMIT Act and an all-of-the-above energy agenda to lower costs and spur growth.
Open campaign source ↗Safety rules, liability, children, and high-risk uses.
Supports mandatory safeguards for child safety, biosafety, health-care decisions, and platform reporting rather than a general development ban.
Ossoff launched an investigation into AI chatbots, synthetic abuse material, and risks to children.
Open official source ↗Called for mandatory screening against AI-assisted biological threats.
Open official source ↗The reviewed House and campaign record does not establish Collins's position on model testing, high-risk AI liability, deepfakes, or general release requirements.
Power supply, household bills, and reliability.
Wants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to prevent data-center generation and infrastructure costs from being passed to Georgia families and to test whether company commitments are enforceable.
The inquiry asks how federal regulators will handle forecasting, interconnection, and cost allocation for large loads.
Open official source ↗Calls for an all-of-the-above energy policy and less permitting friction to lower prices and support more economic activity.
Collins explicitly connects more energy supply and permitting reform to lower costs and growth.
Open campaign source ↗Displacement, hiring, training, and development.
Calls for Congress to prepare for labor-market disruption, automated hiring, and education changes while preserving AI's productivity benefits.
Ossoff convened a bipartisan hearing on AI's implications for work and human rights.
Open official source ↗Frames faster infrastructure and energy development as a route to lower costs, business growth, and more jobs. No AI worker-transition plan was located.
Collins presents his business experience and permitting agenda as tools for job creation and investment.
Open campaign source ↗Platform duties, competition, and business-led development.
Supports enforceable duties for large technology platforms in defined areas while leaving private AI development and market structure otherwise intact.
The REPORT Act increases reporting duties and penalties for technology platforms handling child exploitation material.
Open official source ↗Favors private investment supported by faster permitting and more energy production, with no structural AI competition intervention in the reviewed record.
The campaign's economic agenda relies on business-led development and reduced regulatory barriers.
Open campaign source ↗